The Literary Animal and the Grotesque Survival in Ted Hughes’s “Thrushes”

Authors

  • Amer Rasool Mahdi Department of English, College of Education Ibn Rushed, University of Baghdad.

Abstract

In his opus, Ted Hughes has annexed new and fresh territories of signification to the very notion of the literary animal. Building on the earlier modernist example of the Lawrencian legacy that dwells upon the question of animalism, Hughes seems to have stepped further into the terrain of the sheer struggle when, in his hands, the grotesquerie of survival and violence energizes the topos of the literary animal in his postmodern bestiary. In Hughes’s elemental poetic process this grotesquerie and violence stages the literary animal as a vital poetic device or motif that is finally restored to the primitive power of poetry. In his “Thrushes”, he thus defamiliarizes these tiny creatures’ acts of being to bring upfront into focus this power that has long been deadened and overshadowed by discursiveness and the ersatz, civilized acts of living.

Author Biography

  • Amer Rasool Mahdi, Department of English, College of Education Ibn Rushed, University of Baghdad.

    Dr. Amer Rasool Mahdi is a lecturer in the department of English with a specialization in English Literature at the College of Education (Ibn Rushd). The degrees held are an M.A. and a Ph.D. in English Literature. For almost a decade now, he has been conducting research on postmodern American fiction and modern literary theory. One of his recent research papers going in line with these interests is an article titled “The Platonic Cave Revisited: John Barth’s Prison-house of Narrativity.

Published

2017-01-01

Issue

Section

Department of Russian Language

How to Cite

The Literary Animal and the Grotesque Survival in Ted Hughes’s “Thrushes”. (2017). Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 35, 1-13. https://jcolang.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/JCL/article/view/11

Publication Dates