The Role of Gender and Culture in Dealing with the Arab Woman's Issues Embodied in Caricatures: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Ali Jameel M. Al – Rubaee Education Directorate of Waset, Iraq
  • Rihab Abduljaleel Saeed University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Department of English Language, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.46.0118

Keywords:

cognition, connotation, denotation, gender, semiotics.

Abstract

Gender and culture are among the factors that influence the process of understanding and interpreting different types of communication, especially images. The current study, which is a part of a master’s thesis, aims at investigating the role of gender and culture in interpreting and understanding the caricatures that deal with women’s issues in Arab societies. To this end, the researchers adopted Barthes’ (1957) concepts of denotation and connotation in his theory of mythologies in addition to Langacker’s (1987) theory of (Domains). The research concludes that the female subjects have better cognitive abilities in investing the signs within the selected caricatures. The other factor the study reached to is that the respondents’ different cultures didn’t affect their way of dealing with the caricatures very much, so they supported the issues raised in the caricatures almost equally.

References

Abu Hassan, Z., Schattnen, P., &Mazza, D. (2006). Doing Pilot Study: Why Is It Essential? Malays Fam Physician. 2006; 1(2-3): 70–73. Published online 2006 Aug 31.

Allen, G. 2003. Roland Barthes. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Arain, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L. & Lancaster, G. A. (2010). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology,10 (1).doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.

Barnes, B.(2011). An Introduction to Visual Communication: From Cave Art to Second Life. Peter Lang Publishing Inc. USA.

Bouzida, F. (2014).Proceedings of SOCIOINT14- International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities. Istanbul, Turkey.

Barnes, B.(2011). An Introduction to Visual Communication: From Cave Art to Second Life. Peter Lang Publishing Inc. USA.

Brandt, P. (2010). The Mental Architecture of Meaning: A view from Cognitive Semiotics. Cognitive Science Center for Cognition and Culture, CWRU.

Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to research methods: a practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project(4th ed). Oxford: How To Books.

De Saussure, F. (1915).Course in General Linguistics. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Everett, D.L. (2016). Dark Matter of the Mind: The Culturally Articulated Unconscious. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Ferrando, I. N. (1998).A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of the Lexical Units AT, ON and IN in English. Universitat Jaumei.

Fiske J. , (2002), introduction to communication studies, Taylor &Francis e- library.

Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to Communication Studies, 3rd Edition, Routledge.

Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus: a Practical Guide for Improving Communication and Getting What You Want in a Relationship. HarperCollins, New York.

Hadjadj, C. (2015). An investigation of language use in Arabic caricature in Algerian newspapers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Tlemcen.

Jamieson, G. H. (2007). Visual communication: More than meets the eye. Bristol: Intellect Books.

Jappy, T. (2013).Introduction to Peircean Visual Semiotics.London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Joanna, T. (2010).Oxford Advanced Learners' Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford.

Kronenfeld, D. B. (2018).Culture As a System, How We Know The Meaning and Significance of What We Do and Say.Rutledge.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. 2006 Introduction to Concept, Image, and Symbol. Berlin /New York: Mouton DeGruyter.

Lester, P. 2014 Visual Communication: Images with Messages. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Macdonald, S. &Headlam, N. (2008).Research methods handbook: Introductory guide to research methods for social research. Manchester: UK Centre for Local Economic Strategies.

Merchant, K. (2012). "How Men And Women Differ: Gender Differences in Communication Styles, Influence Tactics, and Leadership Styles". CMC Senior Theses. Paper 513.http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/513

Muslimin, D. M. (2017). Denotative and Connotative Meanings in Masha and the Bear Cartoon Movie (A Semiotic Analysis ). Thesis.

Nida, E. 1998.'Language, culture, and translation. ‘Foreign Languages Journal 115/3: 29-33.

Olshansky, B. (2008). The Power of Pictures: Creating Pathways to Literacy Thought Art, Grades K-6.San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

Panofsky, E. (1970).Meaning in the Visual Arts.Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Yin, R.K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guildford Press.

Zhang, K (2007). Visual Languages and Applications. The University of Texas at Dallas. USA.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

Issue

Section

Department of English language

How to Cite

The Role of Gender and Culture in Dealing with the Arab Woman’s Issues Embodied in Caricatures: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis. (2022). Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 46, 118-157. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.46.0118

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.