Emotional analysis of Surah Yusuf in the argumentative discourse in light of Christine Plantin’s theory
تحلیل پاتوس در گفتمان حجاجی سورۀ یوسف براساس نظریۀ کرستیان پلانتین
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2025.0.51.0285Keywords:
argumentation, Pathos, Surah Yusuf, Kristian Plantin, حجاج، پاتوس، سورۀ یوسف،کرستیان پلانتینAbstract
One of the uses of language to influence others is to argue. Arguments are used to persuade the audience because they try to convince the audience that this thinking is correct or in their favor. The third model in the researches of this theory, which is an extension of Chaim Perelman researches in the direction of reviving Aristotelian rhetoric, examines the reasoning within a discourse. Influence on the audience is being analyzed and categorized. Since the Holy Qur'an contains discourses centered on topics such as: denial of polytheism and idolatry, call to monotheism, call to justice, denial of corruption on earth, etc., we can consider the text of the Holy Qur'an as an argumentative discourse that In this article, we will analyze the manifestation of pathos in Surah Yusuf according to the theory of Christian Plantin. The results of the research show that arousing emotions such as: fear, love, compassion, etc., play an important role in the process of this story. in persuading the audience.
چکیده
یکی از کاربردهای زبان در جهت تأثیرگذاری بر دیگری استدلال کردن است. استدلال‌ها در جهت اقناع مخاطب به کارمی‌روند زیرا سعی دارند مخاطب را قانع کنند که این تفکر درست است و یا به نفع اوست. الگوی سوم در پژوهش‌های این نظریه که امتداد پژوهش‌های شاییم پرلمن در راستای احیای بلاغت ارسطویی است، به بررسی استدلال درون یک گفتمان می‌پردازد.در این رویکرد به بررسی مسأله انواع گفتمان‌ها در رابطه با استدلال پرداخته و روش‌هایی که گفتمان شفاهی و مکتوب از طریق آن سعی در تأثیر گذاری در مخاطب دارد مورد تدقیق و دسته بندی قرارمی‌گیرد. از آنجا که قرآن کریم در بردارندۀ گفتمانهایی با محوریت موضوعاتی همچون: نفی شرک و بت پرستی،دعوت به توحید، دعوت به عدل،نفی فساد بر روی زمین و...است،می توان متن قرآن کریم را گفتمانی استدلالی قلمداد کنیم که در پی اصلاح گری است.در این مقاله بر آنیم تجلی پاتوس را در سورۀ یوسف طبق نظریۀ کریستیان پلانتین مورد تحلیل قراردهیم.نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد برانگیختن عواطفی مانند: ترس، محبت، دلسوزی و..نقش مهمی در روند این داستان نقش مهمی در اقناع مخاطب داشته است.
References
Al-Omari, Muhammad, (2002), on the rhetoric of persuasive speech - a theoretical and applied introduction to the study of Arabic rhetoric, rhetoric in the first century as a model, second edition, Beirut: Casablanca.
Al-Wali, Muhammad, (2005), Metaphor in Greek, Arab, and Western mahataat, first edition, Beirut: Dar Al-Aman Publications.
Al-Wali, Muhammad, (2011), Introduction to argumentative, Plato, Aristotle, and Chaim Perelman, Alam Al-Fikr Magazine, National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, Kuwait, Issue 40, Issue 2..
Al-Moudin, Hassan, (2021), The Rhetoric of argumentative argumentative in Al-Aytous and Al-Batous, Research and Translations, The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan: Dar Kunoz Al-Ma’rifa for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Azzawi, Abu Bakr (2022), Enlarged argumentative, Foundations and Principles, Morocco: Waraqa Bilal Press.
Al-Rifi, Hisham, Argumentative according to Aristotle, among the most important theories of Argumentative in the Western tradition from Aristotle to today, supervised by Hammadi Samoud, Adab Series, Volume: 39, College of Art.
Amosi, Ruth, (2020), Should arguments be integrated into discourse analysis? Problems and Stakes, translated by: Jamal al-Din al-Amarti, Tunisia: Afkar Center for Studies and Research.
Al-Ansari, Ibn Hisham, (1367), Mughni Al-Labib from the Books of Arabs, Qom, Tabrizi Publications, Third edition..
Al-Hashemi, Ahmed, (1389), Javaher al-Balagha, translator: Hasan Irfan, vol. 1 and 2, 10th edition, Qom: Balaghat Publishing House.
Benohashem, Al-Hussein, (2014), The Rhetoric of Argumentative: Greek Origins, Benghazi: United New Book House.
Obaid, Hatem, (2007), Al-Batus, from rhetoric to discourse analysis, Al-Fusoul magazine, Egyptian General Book Authority, Cairo, No. 70.
Soula, Abdullah, (2011), on the argumentative theory: studies and applications, first edition, Tunisia: Dar Al-Janoub for Publishing and Distribution.
Tabatabai, Muhammad Hussein (1374), Tafsir al-Mizan, translated by: Muhammad Baqir Mousavi, Qom: Islamic Publications.
Tabarsi, Fadl bin Hassan, Tafsir Majma’ al-Bayan, translated by: Hashim Rasouli, Tehran: Farahani Publishing.
Tarrous, Muhammad, (2005), Argumentative Theory through Rhetorical, Logical, and Linguistic Studies, Amman: Dar Al-Thaqafa.
The Status of Emotions in argumentative Theories, Alam Al-Fikr Magazine, National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, Kuwait, Issue 40, Issue 2. (2011),
Zamil, Abdulameer Chasib, 2024, Journal of the College of Languages, Issue 49, p. 226-
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the College of Languages (JCL)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
