Semantics of the Russian Verbs of Destruction in Contemporary Linguistics

Семантический Анализ Глаголов Деструкции Русского Языка В Современной Лингвистике

Authors

  • Thikra Talib Khairullah University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Department of Russian Language, Baghdad,Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2021.0.43.0285

Keywords:

destruction verbs, lexical-semantic groups, the meaning of verbs, animate objects, inanimate objects, object of action., глаголы деструкции, лексико-семантические группы, значение глаголов, одушевленные предметы, неодушевленные предметы, объект действия

Abstract

The article states that the Russian verbs of destruction belong to the lexical-semantic group of physical impact. They include verbs with the meaning of “damage” and “destroy”. It is emphasized that each of these groups is relatively independent; the cut line between them is fuzzy and arbitrary. It is postulated that when the object is completely destroyed, then the verb has the meaning of “destruction”,  and when the object is partially destroyed, then the  verb has the meaning of “damage”. It is this feature that individualizes the meaning of verbs. The study distinguishes between the groups and the nature of the object as- animate / inanimate. The object of the action of the “destruction” can only be inanimate, and the object of the action of “damage” and “destruction” can be both animate and inanimate objects.

Аннотация

В статье утверждается, что глаголы деструкции относятся к лексико-семантической группе физического воздействия. Они включают глаголы со значением «повредить» и «уничтожить». Акцентируется внимание, что каждая из этих групп относительно самостоятельная, граница между ними нечеткая и условная. Постулируется, что если объект совсем разрушен, то глагол имеет значение «уничтожить», если частично – то глагол имеет значение «повредить». Именно этот признак индивидуализирует значения глаголов. В нашем исследовании утверждается, что отличает эти группы и характер объекта – одушевленное / неодушевленное. Объектом воздействия действия «разрушать» может быть только неодушевленные, а объектом действия «повредить» и «уничтожить» может быть как существо, так и неодушевленные предметы.

 

      

Author Biography

  • Thikra Talib Khairullah, University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Department of Russian Language, Baghdad,Iraq
    Assistant Professor, Academic qualification and specialization : M. A. in Russian Language/  Linguistics. Many research papers and articles have been published in approved journals for promotion purposes in Iraq and Russia. Many gratitude letters by Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University President and the Deanery of College of Languages from 2008 up to 2018.  Email:Thekrataleb127@gamail.com      

References

Apresyan YU. D. Lexical semantics: synonymous language means, YU. D. Apresyan, Moscow: the scince, 1974, P. 366

Arutyunova N. D. Sentence and its meaning: Logical and semantic problems,N. D. Arutyunova, Moscow? 1976, P. 383

Basilaya N. A. Category of evidence in language,N. A. Basilaya, 1988, P. 303

Vykhovanets E. R. parts of speech in a semantic-grammatical aspect,E. R. Vykhovanets, Kiev: scientific thought, 1988, P. 256.

Vykhovanets E. Theoretical morphology of language, E. Vykhovanets, K. Gorodenskaya, Kiev: 2004, P. 398.

Wolf E. M. Functional evaluation semantics, E. M. Wolf , Moscow, the science, 1985, P.226.

Hook V.G. Semantic interpretation of "deep" and "surface" structures. Invariant syntactic relations of meanings and sentence structure,V. G. Hook, Moscow, the science, 1969, P. 176.

Grigorschuk L. I. Verbs physical transformative impact in modern Russian / L. I. Grigorschuk // Problems of the theory and history of the Russian language. - Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow University, 1980. - P. 5-12.

Egorova E. B. indicative registered form and their communication system in modern Russian: Abstract. Dis. ... cand. filol. Sciences: 10.02.01 / E. B. Egorova - Moscow, 1983. – p. 22.

Espersen O. grammar philosophy / O. Jespersen; [Lane. From English.] And Society. Ed. and preface B. A. Ilisha. - ed. 3rd, stereotyped. - Moscow: Com. Book, 2006. – p. 408.

Zagnitko A. P. Theoretical grammar of the language. Morphology / A. P. Zagnitko. - Donetsk: Dondo, 1996. – p. 437.

Zakirov R. T. semantic derivation of spatial displacement of verbs in the modern Russian language: Thesis. ... cand. filol. Sciences: 10.02.01 / R. T. Zakirov. - Ufa, 2000. - p . 276.

Zemskova E. V. Features verbal nomination in languages of different building (on the material of the compound verbs in Russian and English): dis. ... cand. filol. Sciences: 10.02.19 / E. V. Zemskova. - Saratov, 1994. – P. 164.

Zolotov G. A. About constitutive syntactic units / G. A. Zolotov. - Math. USSR Academy of Sciences, SLYA. - T 40 - 1981, № 6. – p. 497,498.

Katznelson S. D. Typology of language and verbal thinking / S. D. Katznelson. - Leningrad: Nauka, 1972. - p . 216.

Kildibekova T. A. action verbs in the modern Russian language. - Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University, 1985. – P. 158.

Kubryakova E. S. Adjectives in lexical and grammatical system of the English language CONTEMPORARY / E. S. Kubrjakova, Z. A. Kharitonchik. - Minsk Higher School, 1992. – p. 229.

Kuznetsova E. V. Parts of Speech lexical-semantic groups of words / E. V. Kuznetsova // Questions of linguistics. - 1975. - № 5. - p. 161.

Meshchaninov I. I. verb / I. I. Meshchaninov. - Leningrad: Nauka, 1982. - p . 272.

Mirchenko M. V. structure syntactic categories: monograph / M. V. Mirchenko. - Lutsk, look. "Tower" Wolin. gov't. Univ them. Lesya Ukrainka, 2001. – p. 340.

Nikitin M. V. Foundations of linguistic theory of speech / M. V. Nikitin. - Moscow: Higher School, 1988. - p . 271.

Podgaisky I. M. Component "means" in the interpretation of the semantics of English verbs of physical action / I. M. Podgaisky // Collection of scientific reports XII International Conference on Functional Linguistics "functionalism as the basis of linguistic research, Yalta 3-7 October 2005 - Simferopol, 2005. - P. 264,266.

Popkov L. M. semantic structure of a polysemantic word problems and regular polysemy in the modern Russian language: Thesis. ... cand. filol. Sciences: 10.02.01 / L. M. Popkov. - SPb, 1993. -. P. 157.

Potapenko T. A. Lexical semantic characteristic verbs with the general meaning devastating effects on the object / T. A. // Potapenko Philology. - 1983. - № 2. - p. 50,56.

Potapenko T. A. about semantic relationships verbs transformative impact on the object / T. A. Potapenko // Russ. lang. at HQ. - 1978. - № 1. - p 97.

Sultanov A. P. verbs of destruction in the Russian and English languages / A. P. Sultanova // Russian and Comparative Philology: state and prospects: International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the University of Kazan (Kazan, October 4-6, 2004 ). works and materials / under total. Ed. K. Galiullina. - Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan. Zap, 2004.- P. 89-90.

Explanatory Dictionary of Russian verbs: Ideographic description. English equivalents. Synonyms. Antonyms / edited. prof. L. G. Babenko. - Moscow: AST-Press, 1999. – P. 704.

Shvedova N. Yu. Russian language: Selected Works / Ross. Acad. Sciences; By e-Historical and Philological Sciences; Institute of Russian Language. Vinogradov. - Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2005. –P. 640.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-02

Issue

Section

Department of Russian Language

How to Cite

Semantics of the Russian Verbs of Destruction in Contemporary Linguistics: Семантический Анализ Глаголов Деструкции Русского Языка В Современной Лингвистике. (2021). Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 43, 285-302. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2021.0.43.0285

Publication Dates

Similar Articles

11-20 of 185

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.